SOLAR CELLS CUT POLLUTION 90 PERCENT
This article in Scientific American tells it straight. Even allowing for all the energy needed to make them, and even if that came from burning black stuff, they would still reduce pollution by 90% during their life-cycle if they replaced fossil fuels.
So why, why, why are we not putting production of them on a war-footing, globally, with massive injections of public money?
This article in Scientific American tells it straight. Even allowing for all the energy needed to make them, and even if that came from burning black stuff, they would still reduce pollution by 90% during their life-cycle if they replaced fossil fuels.
So why, why, why are we not putting production of them on a war-footing, globally, with massive injections of public money?
posted by Nobilangelo at 13:00
<< Home